Crossing obstacles in a walkway: on the capability of wavelet-based detection strategies using wearable sensor data

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Bonab

2 Department of Electronics, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tabriz

3 Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Western University, Canada

4 Département de kinanthropologie, UQAM, Montreal, Canada

Abstract

Mobility and its quality has direct and significant effect on quality of life. Passing over obstacles is unavoidable and its safe execution is a measure of mobility for community dwellers particularly for elderly and Parkinson patients with higher risk of falling. Algorithms for monitoring mobility in high risk people, need automatic detection to examine frequency and quality of passing over obstacles. Very few attempts can be found in the literature who just focus on the healthy population who need complex algorithms. Furthermore, in real life situations, people encounter a range of obstacle heights that should be detectable in such algorithms. In this paper a wavelet-based algorithm is examined and its performance is evaluated in detection of tall and short obstacles for two groups of healthy and Parkinson participants. Accuracy of this method was 98.5% for the 19 healthy elderly participants, and 90.6% for the 12 Parkinson patients. The maximum error in detection of obstacle crossing time was 0.1 second for either feet and for both barrier heights.

Keywords


[1]             C. Fagerström and G. Borglin, “Mobility, functional ability and health-related quality of life among people of 60 years or older Aging Clinical and Experimental Research,” Aging Clin Exp Res, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 387–394, 2010.
[2]             M. Forhan and S. V. Gill, “Obesity, functional mobility and quality of life,” Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 129–137, 2013.
[3]             S. R. Lord, J. A. Ward, P. Williams, and K. J. Anstey, “An epidemiological study of falls in older community‐dwelling women: the Randwick falls and fractures study,” Aust. J. Public Health, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 240–245, 1993.
[4]             M. J. D. Caetano, S. R. Lord, D. Schoene, P. H. S. Pelicioni, D. L. Sturnieks, and J. C. Menant, “Age-related changes in gait adaptability in response to unpredictable obstacles and stepping targets,” Gait Posture, vol. 46, pp. 35–41, 2016.
[5]             S. C. Huang, T. W. Lu, H. L. Chen, T. M. Wang, and L. S. Chou, “Age and height effects on the center of mass and center of pressure inclination angles during obstacle-crossing,” Med. Eng. Phys., vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 968–975, 2008.
[6]             S. Amatachaya, W. Pramodhyakul, and K. Srisim, “Failures on obstacle crossing task in independent ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury and associated factors,” Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 43–48, 2015.
[7]             F. Feuvrier et al., “Inertial measurement unit compared to an optical motion capturing system in post-stroke individuals with foot-drop syndrome,” Ann. Phys. Rehabil. Med., no. 2018, 2019.
[8]             R. Vitório et al., “Disease severity affects obstacle crossing in people with Parkinson’s disease,” Gait Posture, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 266–269, 2014.
[9]             L. Alcock, B. Galna, J. M. Hausdorff, S. Lord, and L. Rochester, “Gait & Posture Special Issue: Gait adaptations in response to obstacle type in fallers with Parkinson’s disease,” Gait Posture, vol. 61, no. January, pp. 368–374, 2018.
[10]          V. A. I. Pereira et al., “Parkinson’s patients delay fixations when circumventing an obstacle and performing a dual cognitive task,” Gait Posture, vol. 73, pp. 291–298, 2019.
[11]          L. A. Schrodt, V. S. Mercer, C. A. Giuliani, and M. Hartman, “Characteristics of stepping over an obstacle in community dwelling older adults under dual-task conditions,” Gait Posture, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 279–287, 2004.
[12]          E. L. Stegemller, T. A. Buckley, C. Pitsikoulis, E. Barthelemy, R. Roemmich, and C. J. Hass, “Postural instability and gait impairment during obstacle crossing in parkinson’s disease,” Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 703–709, 2012.
[13]          Y. H. Liu, M. Y. Kuo, R. M. Wu, Z. Y. Chen, and T. W. Lu, “Control of the Motions of the Body’s Center of Mass and End-Points of the Lower Limbs in Patients with Mild Parkinson’s Disease During Obstacle-Crossing,” J. Med. Biol. Eng., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 534–543, 2018.
[14]          V.-R. Heli, A. Rauhala, and L. Fagerström, “Person-centered home-based rehabilitation for persons with Parkinson’s disease – a scoping review,” Int. J. Nurs. Stud., p. 103395, 2019.
[15]          E. Twardzik et al., “What features of the built environment matter most for mobility? Using wearable sensors to capture real-time outdoor environment demand on gait performance,” Gait Posture, vol. 68, pp. 437–442, 2019.
[16]          C. Xu, J. He, X. Zhang, C. Wang, and S. Duan, “Template-Matching-Based Detection of Freezing of Gait Using Wearable Sensors,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 129, pp. 21–27, 2018.
[17]          S. Rezvanian and T. E. Lockhart, “Towards real-time detection of freezing of gait using wavelet transform on wireless accelerometer data,” Sensors (Switzerland), vol. 16, no. 4, 2016.
[18]          D. Patashov et al., “Methods for Gait Analysis During Obstacle Avoidance Task,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 2019.
[19]          F. S. Ayachi, H. P. Nguyen, C. Lavigne-Pelletier, E. Goubault, P. Boissy, and C. Duval, “Wavelet-based algorithm for auto-detection of daily living activities of older adults captured by multiple inertial measurement units (IMUs),” Physiol. Meas., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 442–461, 2016.
[20]          A. B.K., W. A.M., and K. D.B., “An introduction to wavelet transforms for chemometricians: A time- frequency approach,” Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 215–239, 1997.
[21]          P. Addison, J. Walker, and R. Guido, “Time - Frequency analysis of biosignals,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, vol. 28, no. 5. pp. 14–29, 2009.